SAFe Alignment Guide
Integrating LocalM™ AiD AI governance principles across SAFe levels for enterprise-scale AI-assisted development.
Overview
SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework) enables enterprise agility through four configuration levels. LocalM™ AiD principles integrate at each level to govern AI-assisted development at scale—from individual team practices to portfolio-level strategy.
flowchart TB
subgraph safe["SAFe Levels"]
portfolio["Portfolio"]
solution["Large Solution"]
essential["Essential"]
team["Team"]
end
subgraph localm["LocalM™ AiD Integration"]
ps["PS: Strategy<br/>& Planning"]
gsc["GSC: Governance<br/>& Compliance"]
dc["DC: Development<br/>& Coding"]
tqc["TQC: Testing<br/>& Quality"]
end
portfolio --> ps
portfolio --> gsc
solution --> gsc
essential --> dc
team --> dc
team --> tqc
style safe fill:#1a1a2e,stroke:#4361ee
style localm fill:#1a1a2e,stroke:#00ff94
SAFe Portfolio Level
Strategic Themes and AI Governance
SAFe Focus: Portfolio strategy, budgeting, Lean governance
LocalM™ AiD Alignment:
| LocalM™ AiD Principle | SAFe Integration |
|---|---|
| PS-001: Architecture First | Include AI governance in Strategic Themes |
| PS-002: AI Integration Strategy | Define AI adoption as Portfolio Epic |
| PS-004: Risk-Based Adoption | Add AI risks to Lean Portfolio Management |
Enabler Epics for AI Governance
| Enabler Epic | LocalM™ AiD Principle | Description |
|---|---|---|
| AI Governance Foundation | GSC-001 | Establish enterprise AI governance framework |
| AI Tool Platform | TSI-001, TSI-002 | Build approved AI tool ecosystem |
| AI Security Baseline | GSC-003, GSC-006 | Implement AI security controls |
| AI Training Program | TTA-001, TTA-002 | Enable organization-wide AI readiness |
Portfolio Kanban AI Governance Items
- AI governance policy reviews
- AI tool evaluations
- AI security assessments
- AI compliance audits
SAFe Large Solution Level
Solution Train AI Governance
SAFe Focus: Coordinating multiple ARTs, solution-level architecture
LocalM™ AiD Alignment:
| LocalM™ AiD Principle | SAFe Integration |
|---|---|
| GSC-001: Governance Framework | Solution governance includes AI controls |
| TSI-003: Interoperability & Portability | Cross-ART AI tool standardization |
| GSC-007: Audit & Accountability | Solution-level AI audit requirements |
Solution Intent AI Extensions
| Artifact | AI Governance Content |
|---|---|
| Solution Context | AI tools in solution scope |
| Fixed Intent | AI security and compliance requirements |
| Variable Intent | AI capability evolution |
| Compliance | AI regulatory requirements |
SAFe Essential Level
ART-Level AI Governance
SAFe Focus: Agile Release Train coordination, PI Planning, Architectural Runway
LocalM™ AiD Alignment:
| LocalM™ AiD Principle | SAFe Integration |
|---|---|
| DC-001: Human-AI Collaboration | Define AI collaboration patterns for ART |
| DC-002: Iterative Development | Include AI governance in PI objectives |
| GSC-003: Access Control | ART-level AI tool access policies |
PI Planning AI Considerations
Program Board AI Items:
- AI tool configuration across teams
- AI-generated code review dependencies
- AI security validation milestones
PI Objectives AI Examples:
- “Implement AI code review gates for all teams”
- “Achieve 100% AI tool access control compliance”
- “Complete AI security training for ART”
System Demo AI Governance
- Demonstrate AI-assisted development practices
- Show AI code review compliance metrics
- Present AI security posture
SAFe Team Level
Team-Level AI Practices
SAFe Focus: Agile team practices, iteration execution, built-in quality
LocalM™ AiD Alignment:
| LocalM™ AiD Principle | SAFe Integration |
|---|---|
| DC-004: Code Review & Validation | AI output review in Definition of Done |
| DC-005: Responsible AI Usage | Team AI usage agreements |
| TQC-001: AI-Output Testing | AI-specific testing in iteration |
| TQC-002: Quality Assurance Integration | AI quality in CI/CD |
Definition of Done AI Extensions
## DoD - AI Governance Extensions
- [ ] AI-generated code reviewed by human developer
- [ ] AI suggestions documented in commit message
- [ ] AI tool usage logged for audit trail
- [ ] Security scan completed on AI-assisted code
- [ ] No sensitive data exposed to AI tools
Team Iteration AI Practices
| Practice | AI Governance Element |
|---|---|
| Iteration Planning | Identify AI-heavy stories, allocate review time |
| Daily Standup | Share AI tool learnings, flag concerns |
| Code Review | Apply AI-specific review criteria |
| Iteration Retrospective | Reflect on AI collaboration effectiveness |
Built-in Quality and AI
Test-First AI Integration
| Quality Practice | AI Governance Integration |
|---|---|
| Test-Driven Development | Write tests before AI generates code |
| Behavior-Driven Development | Human-written acceptance criteria, AI implementation |
| Continuous Integration | AI code passes same gates as human code |
| Automated Testing | AI-generated code has test coverage requirements |
Architectural Runway AI Extensions
| Runway Element | AI Governance Content |
|---|---|
| Technical Foundation | AI tool infrastructure, integration APIs |
| Enabler Capabilities | AI security controls, audit mechanisms |
| Patterns | AI collaboration patterns, review workflows |
| Standards | AI coding standards, prompt guidelines |
DevOps and AI Governance
Continuous Delivery Pipeline AI Gates
flowchart LR
dev["Development"]
review["AI Review Gate"]
test["Testing"]
security["Security Scan"]
audit["Audit Log"]
deploy["Deployment"]
dev --> review --> test --> security --> audit --> deploy
style review fill:#00ff94,stroke:#00cc77
style audit fill:#00ff94,stroke:#00cc77
| Pipeline Stage | AI Governance Gate |
|---|---|
| Commit | AI usage logged |
| Build | AI-generated code identified |
| Test | AI-specific test coverage verified |
| Security | AI code security scan |
| Release | AI compliance audit complete |
Release on Demand AI Considerations
- AI tool versions in release notes
- AI-generated component inventory
- AI security clearance verification
Continuous Learning and AI
Inspect & Adapt AI Focus
| I&A Component | AI Governance Activity |
|---|---|
| PI System Demo | Demonstrate AI governance metrics |
| Quantitative Measurement | AI tool effectiveness, quality impact |
| Retrospective | AI collaboration improvements |
| Problem Solving | Address AI governance gaps |
Innovation and Planning AI Time
- Explore new AI tools and capabilities
- Develop AI governance improvements
- Create AI collaboration experiments
- Build AI training content
SAFe Core Values and AI Governance
| SAFe Core Value | AI Governance Alignment |
|---|---|
| Alignment | AI governance aligned with business strategy |
| Built-in Quality | AI code meets same quality standards |
| Transparency | AI usage visible and auditable |
| Program Execution | AI enables, doesn’t impede delivery |
Implementation Roadmap
Stage 1: Foundation (Team Level)
Focus: Establish team-level AI practices
Activities:
- Add AI governance to Definition of Done
- Train teams on AI code review practices
- Implement AI logging in CI/CD
LocalM™ AiD Principles: DC-004, DC-005, TQC-001
Stage 2: Coordination (Essential Level)
Focus: Coordinate AI governance across ART
Activities:
- Include AI governance in PI Planning
- Establish ART-level AI policies
- Implement cross-team AI standards
LocalM™ AiD Principles: DC-001, DC-002, GSC-003
Stage 3: Scaling (Large Solution/Portfolio)
Focus: Enterprise-scale AI governance
Activities:
- Define AI governance Strategic Themes
- Create Enabler Epics for AI capability
- Establish portfolio-level AI governance
LocalM™ AiD Principles: PS-001, PS-002, GSC-001, GSC-007
SAFe Roles and AI Governance
| SAFe Role | AI Governance Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Release Train Engineer | Coordinate AI governance across ART |
| System Architect | Define AI integration architecture |
| Product Manager | Prioritize AI governance features |
| Scrum Master | Facilitate AI governance practices |
| Developer | Follow AI collaboration practices |
Next Steps
- Assess your SAFe level - Determine which SAFe configurations you’re using
- Map current practices - Identify existing AI governance practices
- Identify gaps - Determine where LocalM™ AiD principles address needs
- Prioritize by level - Start with Team level, scale up
- Integrate incrementally - Add AI governance to existing ceremonies