v0.0.1 β€’ In Peer Review

Deployment & Maintenance (DM) Principles

Enterprise Architecture principles for AI operations lifecycle management.

Category DM
Principles 2
Focus AI Operations Lifecycle
Status πŸ” Under Peer Review

Category Overview

flowchart LR
    Dev["Development"] --> Build["Build"] --> Test["Test"] --> Deploy["Deploy"] --> Operate["Operate"] --> Monitor["Monitor"]

    Monitor --> DM["DM PRINCIPLES"]

    subgraph DM["DM PRINCIPLES"]
        DM001["DM-001: Pipeline Integration"]
        DM002["DM-002: Observability First"]
    end

Key Concerns:

  • CI/CD pipeline architecture for AI-generated code
  • Quality gates with human approval points
  • Monitoring AI-assisted system behavior
  • Incident response for AI-related issues
  • Continuous improvement feedback loops

Principles in This Category

ID Principle Name Statement Summary
DM-001 Pipeline Integration Integrate AI-generated code through quality gates
DM-002 Observability First Establish comprehensive monitoring before deployment

Relationship to Other Categories

flowchart TB
    TQC["TQC: Testing &<br/>Quality Control<br/><i>Quality standards feed into gates</i>"]

    TQC --> DM

    DC["DC: Development<br/>& Coding<br/><i>Code generation practices</i>"]
    DM["DM: Deployment &<br/>Maintenance<br/><i>Pipeline + Monitor practices</i>"]
    GSC["GSC: Governance<br/>Security<br/><i>Compliance audit requirements</i>"]

    DC --> DM
    DM --> GSC

DM-001: Pipeline Integration with Quality Gates

Statement

All AI-generated code must pass through automated quality gates with mandatory human approval before production deployment.

Rationale

Dimension Justification
Business Value Reduces production incidents caused by AI-generated defects
Technical Foundation Automated pipelines catch issues faster than manual review alone
Risk Mitigation Quality gates prevent AI hallucinations and security vulnerabilities from reaching production
Human Agency Maintains human oversight while leveraging automation efficiency

Implications

flowchart LR
    subgraph Pipeline["PIPELINE ARCHITECTURE"]
        Commit["Commit"] --> Build["Build"] --> Test["Test"] --> Security["Security"] --> Review["Review"] --> Stage["Stage"] --> Prod["Prod"]
    end

    Build -.-> Auto1["AUTO"]
    Test -.-> Auto2["AUTO"]
    Security -.-> Auto3["AUTO"]
    Review -.-> Human["HUMAN<br/><i>Mandatory Approval</i>"]

Quality Gates

GATE 1: Build GATE 2: Test GATE 3: Security GATE 4: Review
Compilation Unit tests SAST/DAST Human approval
Linting Integration Dependency scan Sign-off
Style Coverage Secrets detection Β 
Area Implication
Development Must configure CI/CD pipelines with AI-specific quality gates
Governance Define mandatory vs. advisory gates; document exception process
Skills Train teams on pipeline configuration and gate interpretation
Tools Integrate security scanners, coverage tools, approval workflows

Maturity Alignment

Level Requirements
Base (L1) Basic pipeline with human review gate before production
Medium (L2) Automated quality gates with security scanning; structured approval
High (L3) AI-assisted gate decisions; predictive quality analysis; auto-rollback

Governance

Compliance Measures

  • All repositories have CI/CD pipeline configured
  • Security scanning enabled for all code paths
  • Human approval required before production deployment
  • Gate failures documented and tracked
  • Exception requests require documented justification

Exception Process

Condition Approval Required Documentation
Emergency hotfix Tech Lead + Ops Post-incident review
Gate timeout Release Manager Root cause analysis
Security gate bypass Security Team Risk acceptance form
  • TQC-003: Quality Assurance Framework (quality standards for gates)
  • TQC-002: Security Practices (security gate requirements)
  • DC-003: Code Review Practices (human review requirements)
  • GSC-001: Governance Framework (compliance requirements)

DM-002: Observability First

Statement

Establish comprehensive observability (logs, metrics, traces) for AI-assisted systems before deployment to production.

Rationale

Dimension Justification
Business Value Enables rapid incident detection and resolution, minimizing downtime
Technical Foundation AI-generated code may have subtle behavioral issues only visible in production
Risk Mitigation Early detection prevents cascading failures from AI-related defects
Continuous Improvement Monitoring data informs AI tool effectiveness and training improvements

Implications

flowchart TB
    subgraph Pillars["THREE PILLARS OF OBSERVABILITY"]
        Logs["πŸ“‹ LOGS<br/><i>What happened</i><br/>Errors, Warnings, Info, Debug"]
        Metrics["πŸ“Š METRICS<br/><i>How much/many</i><br/>Latency, Throughput, Error rate"]
        Traces["πŸ” TRACES<br/><i>Request flow</i><br/>Span data, Context, Timing"]
    end

    subgraph Engine["CORRELATION ENGINE"]
        Unified["Unified view of system behavior and health"]
    end

    subgraph Outputs["OUTPUTS"]
        Dashboards["Dashboards"]
        Alerts["Alerts"]
        Runbooks["Runbooks"]
    end

    Logs --> Engine
    Metrics --> Engine
    Traces --> Engine
    Engine --> Outputs
Area Implication
Development Instrument code with logging, metrics, and trace context
Governance Define SLOs/SLIs; establish alerting policies
Skills Train teams on observability tools and incident response
Tools Deploy logging aggregation, metrics collection, trace visualization

Key Monitoring Areas

Monitoring Coverage Matrix

Area Metrics Logs Traces Alerts
Application ● ● ● ●
Infrastructure ● ● β—‹ ●
Security ● ● ● ●
Business ● β—‹ β—‹ ●
Legend: ● Required β—‹ Recommended

Alert Classification

Severity Response Time Example Action
Critical Immediate Service down Page on-call
High < 15 min Error rate spike Page team
Medium < 1 hour Performance degradation Notification
Low < 24 hours Warning threshold Ticket

Maturity Alignment

Level Requirements
Base (L1) Basic logging and error alerting; manual incident response
Medium (L2) Full observability stack; SLOs defined; structured runbooks
High (L3) AI-assisted anomaly detection; predictive alerting; auto-remediation

Governance

Compliance Measures

  • All services have logging, metrics, and traces configured
  • Critical alerts have associated runbooks
  • SLOs defined and tracked for key services
  • Incident response procedures documented
  • Regular observability audits conducted

Incident Response Process

flowchart LR
    Detect["DETECT<br/><i>Alerts trigger response</i>"]
    Triage["TRIAGE<br/><i>Severity assessment</i>"]
    Investigate["INVESTIGATE<br/><i>Log/trace analysis</i>"]
    Resolve["RESOLVE<br/><i>Fix/deploy verification</i>"]
    Review["REVIEW<br/><i>Post-incident review</i>"]

    Detect --> Triage --> Investigate --> Resolve --> Review

AI-Specific Considerations:

  • Check if AI-generated code is involved
  • Review recent AI-assisted changes
  • Document AI tool involvement in incident
  • Feed learnings back to AI training/configuration
  • DM-001: Pipeline Integration (deployment triggers monitoring setup)
  • TQC-002: Security Practices (security monitoring requirements)
  • GSC-001: Governance Framework (audit and compliance monitoring)
  • DC-004: Agentic Development (autonomous agent monitoring)

Category Summary

Principle Matrix

Principle BASE (L1) MEDIUM (L2) HIGH (L3)
DM-001 Pipeline Integration Basic pipeline + review Quality gates + security AI-assisted decisions + auto-rollback
DM-002 Observability First Basic logging + alerting Full stack + SLOs + runbooks Predictive + auto-remediate

Legend: Requirements increase with maturity level

Key Takeaways

  1. Quality gates are non-negotiable - Every deployment path includes automated and human checkpoints
  2. Human approval remains mandatory - Production deployments require explicit human sign-off
  3. Observability enables confidence - You can’t manage what you can’t measure
  4. Maturity unlocks automation - Higher levels enable AI-assisted operations
  5. Feedback loops improve AI - Monitoring data informs AI tool effectiveness

Next Steps

Action Link
View all principles Principles Index
Related: Testing & QC TQC Principles
Related: Governance GSC Principles
Maturity assessment Maturity Model

License